👍 Pros‍‍

• Accurate transcription in over 40 languages, up to 99% accuracy.
• Supports MP3, MP4, MOV, and AVI with resolutions up to 1080p.
• Handles files up to three hours long or 3GB.
• Trint specializes in optimizing video content for formats like 16:9, 9:16, and 1:1, with resolutions up to 1080p.
• Integrates with Adobe Premiere Pro, Zapier, and Dropbox for streamlined workflows.
• Offers speaker identification and time-stamped transcripts for easy navigation.
• Includes collaboration features like shared workspaces and commenting tools.
• Provides multilingual translation for 54 languages in Advanced and Enterprise plans.

👎 短所

• Limited to files under three hours or 3 GB in size.
• No 4K video support 
• Lacks advanced editing tools for video content.
• Pricing is higher than many competitors.

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• Edit audio by editing text.
• Screen recording and multitrack editing.
• Overdub feature for voice cloning.

👎 短所

• Steeper learning curve for beginners.
• Lacks options for detailed video edits and caption animations.
• Higher pricing for advanced features.

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• リアルタイム転写。
• 多言語に対応。
• 一般的な会議プラットフォームと統合

👎 短所

• 無料プランでは転送分数が制限されます。
• Does not support advanced video editing or animated subtitle features.
• 時折、転記ミスがある。

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• Transcribes in multiple languages.
• Speaker labeling.
• Pay-as-you-go pricing is handy for occasional use.
• Integrates with various platforms.

👎 短所

• Pay-as-you-go pricing can add up.
• Limited video editing capabilities.
• Lacks animated caption options.
• Accuracy varies with audio quality.

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• 人間による転写で高い精度を実現。
• 他のプラットフォームに比べて経済的な料金。
• 多言語に対応。
• 迅速な配達オプション。

👎 短所

• 人間による転写のコストが高い。
• Does not include advanced video editing features.
• AIのテープ起こしは精度が低い。

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• 多数の言語をサポート。
• AIと人間によるテープ起こしの両方を提供。
• 納期が早い。

👎 短所

• 人間による転写の方が値段が高い。
• Offers fewer animated captions or advanced editing tools.
• AIの転写精度は様々です。

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• Combines AI and human transcription to achieve over 99% accuracy.
• Employs encrypted workflows to ensure confidentiality and data protection.
• Specialized services for various industries.
• Provides transcription services in multiple languages, including Spanish, French, and Chinese.
• 競争力のある価格設定。

👎 短所

• Turnaround time varies.
• Lacks features for professional video editing.
• No real-time transcription.

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• 音声1分あたり0.25ドルという競争力のある価格設定で、サブスクリプションは不要。 
• 10分の音声ファイルを3分以内に書き起こすなど、迅速にトランスクリプトを提供。
• 使いやすい。
• .txt、.docx、.json、.pdfを含む様々なエクスポートオプションをサポートし、多様なユーザーの好みに対応。

👎 短所

• 精度は音質に左右される。
• Does not provide tools for advanced video editing or animated text overlays.
• 人間によるテープ起こしオプションはありません。

価格設定

👍プロ⬅200D

• 多言語に対応。
• 高度なAIを活用し、音声を素早くテキストに変換し、字幕を生成します。
• トランスクリプトとサブタイトルのシームレスな編集を可能にするユーザーフレンドリーなエディターにより、ワークフローの効率を向上
• Enables team collaboration with features like shared workspaces, and streamlining project management.

👎 短所

• 人為的なサービスは割高だ。
• Falls short in advanced editing tools and dynamic subtitle options.
• 自動転写の精度は様々です。

価格設定

‍

👍 Pro

• Edit videos by editing the transcript.
• making video editing as intuitive as editing a document.
• Provides a searchable repository for video content.
• Offers real-time feedback and sharing capabilities.
• Simplifies the video editing process for teams.
• Collaborative tools for team-based projects.

👎 短所

• Limited advanced video editing features.
• Doesn’t support professional-grade video editing.
• Pricing can be high for small teams.

価格設定

👍プロ⇄200D

• Handles 9:16, 16:9, 1:1, and 4:5 aspect ratios, facilitating seamless multi-platform content delivery without the need for reformatting.
• Automates tasks like captioning in over 50 languages, B-roll integration, auto-zoom, and sound effects, significantly reducing editing time.
• Processes over 10,000 videos daily, with a total of 4 million videos edited, demonstrating proven enterprise-grade reliability.
• Offers captions in 50+ languages with over 98% accuracy.
• Trusted by industry leaders such as Zapier, Booking.com, and Uber.
• Offers multi-user collaboration, client approval workflows, and batch processing capabilities, streamlining operations for agencies.

👎 短所

• New users may require time to fully utilize all features.
• Advanced features are available in higher-priced plans, which may be a factor for budget-conscious users.

価格設定

⚡️ AI Remove Silences (Winner Submagic)‍

Submagic automatically detects and removes silences, creating smooth, engaging content effortlessly. Trint lacks this functionality, requiring manual edits for cleaner audio. Submagic excels at saving time with seamless automation.

🎥 Animated Subtitles (Winner Submagic)‍

Submagic offers customizable, animated subtitles. This allows you to add dynamic colors, emojis, and placement adjustments for visual appeal. Trint provides standard captions but lacks customization.

🧠 Podcast Clip Generation (Winner Submagic)‍

Submagic identifies key moments in podcasts, generating short, viral clips perfect for promotion. Trint offers basic editing but lacks automated precision.

📱 Collaborative Transcription Workflow (Winner Trint)‍

Trint provides robust real-time collaboration tools, and works for teams editing and verifying transcripts. Submagic offers more language options and stronger video editing features, but it doesn't match Trint’s transcription collaboration capabilities.

‍

Submagic’s edge lies in its AI-powered video editing tools that cater to dynamic, short-form content.

‍

Trint is better suited for transcription-heavy projects requiring team collaboration. Submagic wins for creators seeking automation and creativity.

‍

‍